Javascript must be enabled to use all features of this site and to avoid misfunctions
1789-1793 Doji bara famine vs. 1828 Nagasaki...
HOME
Select category:
Disasters
Select category
NEW

Advertising

Cancel

Search in
Close

1789-1793 Doji bara famine vs 1828 Nagasaki Typhoon Siebold

1789-1793 Doji bara famine
1828 Nagasaki Typhoon Siebold
Change

1789-1793 Doji bara famine

Total costsN/A
Deaths 11000000

Informations

The Doji bara famine (also Skull famine) of 1791–1792 in the Indian subcontinent was brought on by a major El Niño event lasting from 1789–1795 and producing prolonged droughts. Recorded by William Roxburgh, a surgeon with the British East India Company, in a series of pioneering meteorological observations, the El Niño event caused the failure of the South Asian monsoon for four consecutive years starting in 1789.The resulting famine, which was severe, caused widespread mortality in Hyderabad, Southern Maratha Kingdom, Deccan, Gujarat, and Marwar (then all ruled by Indian rulers). In regions like the Madras Presidency (governed by the East India Company), where the famine was less severe, and where records were kept, half the population perished in some districts, such as in the Northern Circars. In other areas, such as Bijapur, although no records were kept, both the famine and the year 1791 came to be known in folklore as the Doji bara (also Doĝi Bar) or the 'skull famine,' on account, it was said, of the 'bones of the victims which lay unburied whitening the roads and the fields.' As in the Chalisa famine of a decade earlier, many areas were depopulated from death or migration. According to one study, a total of 11 million people may have died during the years 1789–1792 as a result of starvation or accompanying epidemics of disease.

Source: Wikipedia
Change

1828 Nagasaki Typhoon Siebold

Total costsN/A
Deaths 19113

Informations

This article documents Pacific typhoon seasons that occurred during the middle of 19th century and earlier. The list is very incomplete; information on early typhoon seasons is patchy and relies heavily on individual observations of travellers and ships. There were no comprehensive records kept by a central organisation at this early time.

Source: Wikipedia

More intresting stuff